Scientists now say that Earth may be trapped in an abnormal bubble of space-time that is particularly devoid of matter. This sounds suspiciously as if scientists have been studying not the universe, but the insides of their heads. This bubble, they say, clearly explains why it appears that the universe isn’t actually expanding, as they say it is, although it clearly is, although it’s not totally apparent, even though it is, because they say so.
I don’t know who these “scientists” always quoted by the press really are, but I suspect that some crackpot just picks up the phone and dials some number at the Associated Press until he or she reaches someone in need of a hot story. He or she starts out by saying, “I’ve been thinking. . .” which should immediately put the listener on alert. Global warming, incidentally, sounds like a hot story.
One of the biggest problems with these people is that they immediately believe whatever they happen to think up. They treat the Big Bang Theory as if it’s the Big Bang Fact, never bothering to explain how, if something explodes, the billions of parts of the smithereens can remain in precisely the same relative positions to each other for billions of years. For some reason, they believe that a “constantly expanding universe” sounds better than just a universe that just happens to be there. Before the advent of GPS systems, using satellites, navigation would have been pretty interesting if the stars happened to be in different places each evening or early morning, when they were used for determining one’s position on our sphere.
Even though the Theory of Evolution is a theory, it is now treated as the Fact of Evolution, although no evidence supporting the theory has ever been found. Oh, they’ll find that evidence, eventually, we’re assured, as schools are ordered to teach the theory as the one true fact concerning our existence. It’s still not clear in my mind how a fish gave birth to a salamander, or how the salamander eventually bore a rabbit, but if humans evolved from some pool of water previously devoid of life, it stands to reason that every creature on Earth must have been something else at one time. And why would some roaches continue being roaches for millions of years, when it would be clearly better to become humans? If cavemen disappeared because they evolved into better human beings, why did the monkeys keep hanging around?
It’s a fact of life, no pun intended, that it’s impossible to mix up a bunch of chemicals and make something that is living. That’s exactly what we’re supposed to blindly believe, although no one has answered the one question I’ve asked many times. If every living thing survives solely by consuming some other living thing or things, what did the first living things consume, if nothing else was living? There had to be a first organism, in order to support this theory, so how did it manage to make some other organism before dying of starvation? Why does no one ever question this?

I like when people come up with crazy theories to explain away why their present theories seem to be flawed. One of my favorites is the recent claim that man-made global warming definitely exists, even though it’s getting colder. The reason that it’s getting colder is because global warming causes climate change. This is the only way to explain the fact that the Earth has gotten cooler since 1998, just when we’re in the middle of that darned global warming. Last year, two women were going to prove something or other about the Arctic ice melting, I guess by proving that there was no ice to walk across. I’m not sure exactly what they were attempting to accomplish, but they stopped after the first day because they got frostbite. Another group was going to march across Massachusetts to demonstrate against global warming, but spent the first night trudging through several feet of snow. They were given warm soup at a shelter in the first town they reached. A global warming conference was canceled due to snow and ice. The year before, Al Gore ranted about global warming in twenty-degree weather. (Note to global warming alarmists: If you’re going to inform the public about global warming, do it during the summer, when there’s a chance it may be warm.)
I happen to have a few theories of my own, which are simply random musings, but could be worth considering. One is that there are lots of stars in the sky, and driving SUVs is not going to make them go away. The sun happens to be one of those stars, the only one you can never see during the night.
Polar bears know how to swim and are adept at walking on land forms other than ice. They actually prefer eating out of trash cans over running around killing prey. If the Arctic ice disappears, they won’t.
Carbon dioxide is not a greenhouse gas; it’s something that plants need for survival. Plants convert CO2 to oxygen, which is something animals, including humans, need for survival.
If there’s too much CO2 hanging around in the atmosphere, make more fire extinguishers. Most of them are never used. Also, make more golf courses. They can suck up carbon dioxide at almost alarming rates.
It would take millions of years to convert coal miners to diamond miners, so let’s burn more of the darned coal. It’s very clean now, thanks to the new scrubbers being built.
Environmentalists are destroying the planet, with an emphasis on our own country. They don’t want anyone using natural resources, which contradicts the term, “resources.” The lumber industry has actually saved a lot of trees, because log cabins required an entire tree trunk for one board.
There doesn’t seem to be enough sanity to go around. Politicians seem to be especially devoid of this characteristic.
Maybe the Hadron Collider is dangerous and could destroy the Earth, and maybe it’s not. Why take the chance, just to satisfy the whims of some crackpot scientists? One of the things they’re attempting is to recreate, on a smaller scale, the Big Bang, something that maybe never happened. They’re also hoping to find another dimension, but it’s hard enough working with the ones we have.
Politicians running for office are much like individuals in the early stages of dating. They present an image that looks much better than the real thing. Before voting, think of yourself as a bull and try to imagine the size of the sword hidden behind the cape. You’ll never see it until it’s too late.
Rationalization only seems right because it’s easier than admitting the truth. Morals haven’t changed, but people’s revised perception of them has. If you believe in God, rest assured that He doesn’t agree with the revisions.